chrisj.doran@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
schrieb:
> On 17 Jul, 02:28, "rodney" <pookiet...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> <chrisj.do...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>
>> Catalogue numbers may have changed since Roger's 1965 cat. The
>> 1331/1915 1pi blue is now 555 if p12 or 555a if p12x13.5 compound;
>>
>> Hmmm, Is the SG maestro fallible? I challenge that Chris,
>> 515 is Sultan Mohammed5
>
> True, but I never said 5_1_5. I fear your catalogue blindness is
> spreading to reading NG posts :-)
>
>> In fact I disagree with your numbers
>> Gerhard's dates are confusing the issue,
>> the left hand (5 pointed star) was issued 1916
>
> True, and is 685, as I said.
>
>> the RHS (six pointed star) was issued 1915
>
> True, and is 5_5_5, as I said.
>
>> Both basic "Type 23"
>
> True.
>
>> That makes the RHS SG685 and sub numbers.
>
> False. The RHS one has the earlier 6-pointed 1331/1915 star and is
> hence the lower number, 555.
>
>> The overprint with the blocking of the Sultan's face remains unknown
>> I assume, I'll kick some tyres in other groups to see if I can solve.
>> Perhaps the original query was never solved.
>
> It would be nice to see more of the set. I only have two. Both have
> the inscription, but different obliterating marks. Perhaps it's only
> the inscription that matters. Do other cats explain it better?
>
> Chris
>
Hi Chris,
I converted the overprint dates by a website from the islamic calendar
to gregorian. this works not exact. but I hope the arabic numbers are
exact. so I think Your dates are right.
I used this site:
http://home.snafu.de/bassara/islajahr.htm
thank You for Your information.
kind regards from Bavaria
Gerhard
|
