Re: Austria #1 & #2 - Reprints ?

In a recent message 20April <20April@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:21:18 +0100, Tony Clayton
<tony@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> >In a recent message "Mark Bardell" <markbardell1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> >> I have these Austria, #1 & #2 single & pair. They seem too good to be

> >> originals so was wondering if they may be reprints ?
> 
> >>
http://s255.photobucket.com/albums/hh134/cobbie10/?action=view&current=at2.jpg
> 
> >>
http://s255.photobucket.com/albums/hh134/cobbie10/?action=view&current=at1.jpg
> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mark.
> 
> >Almost certainly, by the look of them.
> 
> Just because they look fresh does not make them necessarily reprints.

It is not the freshness.  It is the paper and appearance of the print.
The value tablets are far too neat.

> 
> What does MICHEL have to say, to definitively make them other than
original?
> 

-- 
Tony Clayton           tony.clayton.1962@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 of the UK      : http://www.coins-of-the-uk.co.uk
Sent using RISCOS on an Acorn Strong Arm RiscPC
.... A lie that can be passed off as truth becomes truth.