On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:40:23 -0700, "Owen W. Linzmayer"
<IBNS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>I've been looking at the new SCWPM Modern Issues 14th edition and it
>occurred to me that maybe it's unnecessary to include values for VG, VF,
and
>UNC when in my experience all most collectors want are perfect UNC notes.
Not everybody wants perfect UNC notes. Not all notes are perfect UNC.
What is your alternative?
>I realize some of the rarer and older notes are desirable in lesser
grades,
>but do you really think it's required to list VG and VF pricing? A great
>number of notes are listed at FV in anything less than UNC, and given how
>unreliable the SCWPM pricing can be anyway, would the lack of VG and VF
>pricing be a deal killer for catalog buyers?
So long as people are desirous of buying and selling banknotes in less
than UNC grades, then the answer is yes. If dealers are willing to
sell all these rare and otherwise valuable but less than UNC notes at
two for a dollar, then I wouldn't have a problem with that either!
Padraic
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com
**
|
