In article <C4950017.4E534%IBNS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
IBNS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> I've been looking at the new SCWPM Modern Issues 14th edition and it
> occurred to me that maybe it's unnecessary to include values for VG, VF,
and
> UNC when in my experience all most collectors want are perfect UNC
notes.
>
> I realize some of the rarer and older notes are desirable in lesser
grades,
> but do you really think it's required to list VG and VF pricing? A great
> number of notes are listed at FV in anything less than UNC, and given
how
> unreliable the SCWPM pricing can be anyway, would the lack of VG and VF
> pricing be a deal killer for catalog buyers?
Some of us are on a lower budget, and look for more modest notes.
Settling for one that is crumpled, etc, means that at least I "a"
sample. As opposed to not having one at all.
So, yes, I would consider it im****tant for a catalogue to list
the lower grades/prices.
--
Get Credit Where Credit Is Due
http://www.cardre****t.com/
Credit Tools, Reference, and Forum
|
