"]v[etaphoid" <]v[etaphoid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:44d7271b$0$21285$5a62ac22@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:koFBg.8242$rP1.3077@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> Setting up bots to post on NYE constitutes a "life" I suppose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you really suppose that? How pathetic of you to take so much
>>>>>> notice.
>>>>>> How pathetic of you to keep on bleating about it.
>>>>>> That BOT served its purpose, which is more than can be said for you
>>>>>> or anything you have ever done.
>>>>>
>>>>> Created any other "bots" lately, Steve?
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems like that one experiment was just a one-off. What kind of
>>>>> controls did you employ to ensure that your "Anti-social geekbots
and
>>>>> NYE - an unlikely premise" investigation yielded any valid
>>>>> observations or conclusions?
>>>>
>>>> It has expanded the horizon of dingleberries like you. Given them a
>>>> purpose to post.
>>>> What more could one ask a BOT for?
>>>
>>> One could invent a bot, retrospectively even, to distract attention
from
>>> the fact that one is a social misfit who has nothing better to do on
New
>>> Years Eve than imagine robots and nerd it up on Usenet...
>>
>> Give it a shot then stupid, instead of doing your normal trick of
>> dangling from my arse.
>
> No point re-inventing the wheel, Dexter...
Tell that to your pointless sock puppet, Numbat.
|
