I must've missed something... someone posted something about you guys?
I think a decade ago is long enough for Ebay to let whatever happened
go. That wasn't THAT huge of an infraction (though you probably
should have thunk kids surf... but today? They see more surfing for
Paris Hilton *** tapes or playing video games like Grand Theft Auto).
By the way, I saw one **** photo on Ebay just the other day not on the
mature section so obviously their software is not that great. I never
understood where the line is drawn on ****ity either. Why is it
someone can paint a **** and it's ok (even if realism) but it's not
for a tasteful photo? Now I can see some are HUGE boobs or something
in very provocative poses can be said to solicit *** and made to
titillate, but where's the line?
Anyway, your problem is no biggie so why even defend it. Ignore the
trolls.
On Tue, 20 May 2008 01:57:48 -0400, "AutographPros.com"
<mike@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(romovethispart)autographpros.com> wrote:
>Again this person who people on this board are claiming is Strickler is
>posting lies. Barefoot was not kicked off ebay for PSA/DNA violations,
he
>was removed for ****ll bidding but supposedly since then was allowed back
on.
>If you were referring to us, we've never once had any issue with any of
our
>items or account involving PSA/DNA or any incident to do with any issues
>regarding authenticity for that matter. Every item ever submitted to
>PSA/DNA's quick opinion from ebay bidders back when we had an ebay
account
>had always passed. Our account was tem****arily suspended due to a
>connection to one of my very first accounts from almost a decade ago.
When
>I ran that account, I accidently posted 'mature' celebrity unsigned
images
>(Angelina Jolie see-thru top, etc.) in the main section of ebay one too
many
>times. As a result the account was suspended and at the time, I never
>bothered reinstating it as our original ebay account of Autograph Pros
was
>doing just fine without me needing to sell $5 celebrity photos. Now ebay
>has software and strict rules that if you ever are connected to a
previously
>suspended account, all accounts are cancelled. We never did anything
>illegal and while I admit it was an honest mistake, it seems much of
ebay's
>new policies are poor decisions as well. We were told we'd be able to
get
>back on in 6 months but our website and direct marketing have taken off
so
>well, we have no need. I don't miss the ebay fees, I don't miss the ebay
>customers offering $100 on an Eric Clapton or BB King signed guitar, I
don't
>miss any of it. By the way, I can prove what I say to any of the
regulars
>if anyone is questioning my sincerity. Considering I try to provide more
>photos signing and video footage of my items being signed than possibly
any
>other autograph dealer out there, I'd like to think my word is worth
>something but I'd be happy to prove this liar wrong.
|
