Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Collecting > Autographs > Re: Q for baref...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 28 of 43 Topic 6487 of 6648
Post > Topic >>

Re: Q for barefoot

by "Gummby3" <gummby3@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 6, 2008 at 11:57 AM

We could both be right.  I'm honestly the exact opposite of your 
clients.  I consider a good ****tion of the "hot" people now to be 
flash in the pans that will fall from people's minds quicker than what 
the Jehovah's Witness just rattled on at their front door.  I am only 
38, supposedly on the fringes of the clients that buy the Kat Von Ds, 
the Karda****an and whoever.  Honestly, I would right have Bruce 
Jenner's (the Karda****an step-father) autograph as he actually 
contributed something to BE famous and worthy of an autograph request. 
The Kard. sisters, the Hilton sisters, etc. are ONLY famous because 
they were born with a name.  Von D is ONLY a tattoo artist.  They have 
not contributed anything to this country to be worthy of an autograph 
request. LOL  Hillary Duff, Britney Spears and Miley Cyrus are only 
famous because of the "Disney Machine" cookie cutter.  Other than 
Christina Aguilera, we've seen how well the results have been with the 
cookie cutters. :-)  For me, I would rather have those "forgotten" 
celebs.  Now, if Ford was a realistic price for someone that actually 
works for a living, then I would be interested in his too, but not 
these astronomical prices.  People may be paying it, but he's not 
worth that value.  Just my .02¢.

-- 


Mike
Gummby3
-= Star Collector =-
www.star-collector.net
Celebrity addresses the way they should be - free.


"barefoot" <barefootmk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:ba1a3a6a-c42a-4bef-81ec-1a1c7fd045d6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> you say that people won't be able to re sell them...but to be
> honest...i don't think that people buying the autographs for$300 or 
> so
> are intending to sell them...yes, you are right, it's probably the 
> top
> of the market to sell any living person's autograph for $300+. but 
> i'm
> gonna say this. it's tough out there. and it's not worth the time to
> sell it for less. i tried to sell a ford, for $75 on ebay, like 4
> years ago. but it got no bids. but there were at least 5, for under
> $30 and they all got bids. and none of those were real.
>
> you could be right, obvious there are fewer lawrence 
> olivier's...much
> fewer. but i think you are wrong in thinking that people who love 
> old
> hollywood will always care. i think when generations die down, 
> people
> stop caring. out of sight, out of mind. and as hollywood keeps 
> making
> remakes of movies, people will care even less. Charlton heston 
> doesn't
> sell. he didn't sell before he passed, and doesn't sell after. even 
> if
> you factor out the ebay's "hot now" scenario, old, deceased actors
> don't matter to a lot of people unless they are coinsiderably older. 
> a
> 20 year old doesn't walk into an autograph store and get excited by 
> a
> lawrence olivier, but they will buy the cast photo signed by the
> karda****an sisters for $100. or, in my case, at frank n sons, i sold 
> a
> STACK of kat von d autographs for $50 a piece, but my kirk douglas
> just sits there and no one asks about him. same price. so using that
> logic, i'd say that once the people 50 and older start to pass on, 
> the
> legacy of olivier(and others like him) will fade into oblivion.
> m
 




 43 Posts in Topic:
Q for barefoot
"Mr Black" <  2008-05-05 14:46:06 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-04 22:42:29 
Re: Q for barefoot
"Mr Black" <  2008-05-05 21:41:17 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-17 18:53:26 
Re: Q for barefoot
Sue H <dahoov2@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 10:24:31 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-05 09:38:41 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-05 09:53:01 
Re: Q for barefoot
Sue H <dahoov2@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 14:32:09 
Re: Q for barefoot
"Gummby3" <g  2008-05-05 14:04:27 
Re: Q for barefoot
"Mr Black" <  2008-05-06 19:57:06 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-07 09:06:10 
Re: Q for barefoot
"Gummby3" <g  2008-05-07 13:07:59 
Re: Q for barefoot
Sue H <dahoov2@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 16:35:59 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-18 13:00:10 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-05 11:46:08 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-05 12:03:42 
Re: Q for barefoot
"Mr Black" <  2008-05-06 19:55:23 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-05 12:33:18 
Re: Q for barefoot
"Gummby3" <g  2008-05-05 15:11:21 
Re: Q for barefoot
Sue H <dahoov2@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 18:18:41 
Re: Q for barefoot
Sue H <dahoov2@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 18:16:27 
Re: Q for barefoot
"bob catz" <  2008-05-06 22:34:01 
Re: Q for barefoot
northfield <corvoescur  2008-05-05 14:10:48 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-06 03:00:08 
Re: Q for barefoot
Sue H <dahoov2@[EMAIL   2008-05-06 09:14:42 
Re: Q for barefoot
"Gummby3" <g  2008-05-06 12:06:30 
Re: Q for barefoot
Sue H <dahoov2@[EMAIL   2008-05-06 13:50:43 
Re: Q for barefoot
"Gummby3" <g  2008-05-06 11:57:27 
Re: Q for barefoot
"bob catz" <  2008-05-06 22:41:34 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-06 11:03:07 
Re: Q for barefoot
"Gummby3" <g  2008-05-06 13:53:26 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-06 11:26:04 
Re: Q for barefoot
"Gummby3" <g  2008-05-06 14:10:15 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-08 09:10:20 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-07 05:41:00 
Re: Q for barefoot
"Gummby3" <g  2008-05-07 08:59:24 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-07 07:11:32 
Re: Q for barefoot
Sue H <dahoov2@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 10:44:28 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-09 10:41:37 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-09 10:49:44 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-10 00:37:50 
Re: Q for barefoot
barefoot <barefootmk@[  2008-05-17 18:25:34 
Re: Q for barefoot
Sue H <dahoov2@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 21:37:13 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Aug 20 17:42:28 CDT 2008.