Maybe Strickler did buy some fakes in lots. Anybody that collects
autographs, unless you get EVERY one of them in person, has gotten a
bad apple in their collection at one point or another. If they say
that they haven't they are either 1) lying or 2) in denial. Again,
not to beat a dead horse, but the same question pops into my mind when
these "professionals" are brought up: Who authenticates the
authenticators? Since these people did not see the item signed
themselves, they are only guessing and taking people's money for
giving a 50/50 answer. It makes me think of those carnies that take
money to guess your weight... they might be right by approximating
weight by appearance or they might be wrong. These "authenticators"
are doing no more and no less. They state their opinion by comparing
to other examples, but everybody's signatures varies by day, year or
cir***stance. I have convention-signed autographs by some celebs that
don't match examples on Autograph World and other reputable dealers,
but I have proof that the item was signed. Why were they different?
By the final day of a 3-day con and several hundred people, your
signature will not even look exactly like it did on the first day. :-)
--
Mike
Gummby3
-= Star Collector =-
www.star-collector.net
Celebrity addresses the way they should be - free.
"Timmy" <spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:lpGdnSHYJquE74PVnZ2dnUVZ_tijnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Authentic? Get your items checked by a professional! I'd be
> willing to bet if you sent your items from him to PSA/DNA, GAI,
> James Spence, and Rogger Epperson, I'd bet they'd fail at each
> place. FYI, Strickler S****ts used to be a UACC member but now it
> appears they are no longer. I guess it's time for Lon to start
> coming up with some smear campaign for the UACC to justify his lack
> of member****p status.
>
>
> "bob catz" <mowersales@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:Y9ednb_Jac86WYDVnZ2dnUVZ_tWtnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> You mean Strickler Autographs? His stuff is authentic.
|
