trippin-2-8-track wrote:
> On May 6, 8:36 am, George Grapman <sfgeo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> trippin-2-8-track wrote:
>>> On May 5, 7:57 pm, George Grapman <sfgeo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> trippin-2-8-track wrote:
>>>>> one reason: Operation Chaos c/o Rush Limbaugh's dittoheads
>>>>> 108,000 Repubicans voted for Hillay in Texas primary per Rush's
>>>>> orders...
>>>>> they won't vote that way in the general election in November-
they'll
>>>>> vote for McCain
>>>>> build her up, to cut her down
>>>> Have a cite for that 108,000 number?
>>> tune in to Limbaugh daily from 12-3 EST daytime, the "troops" call in
>>> with daily progress re****ts
>> Sorry, but Limbaugh and his callers do not constitute a cite/ Again,
>> where is a cite for that number?
>> If it is such a success why did Hillary have a 20 point lead in PA
>> before the stunt and wing up with a 9 point lead?
>> Also, if Limbaugh has such power among his base why is his least
>> favorite Republican getting the nomination?
>>
>>
>>
>>> you guys need to pay more attention to what's going on...I'm starting
>>> to think the Chinese Communists could move 500,000 troops into Canada
>>> and be on our northern borders, and CNN and MSNBC would not re****t it
>>> and keep you people in the dark
>>> watch Fox news and listen to Rush, you'll be up to date and get the
>>> "real" news that is filtered out of the mainsteam media
>> Translation-You can not back up your claim.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>
>
> Limbaugh's predictions have been proven right and correct, 98% of the
> time- moreso than any other commentator or newscast
>
> wake up, smell the coffee
Which predictions would that be:
The Democrats imploding in 2006?
Operation Chaos working in PA?
Have a cite for that 98 percent or will you just tell us Limbaugh said
so?
|
