trippin-2-8-track wrote:
> On May 6, 8:31 am, George Grapman <sfgeo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> trippin-2-8-track wrote:
>>
>> What ever happened to that request to back up your claim thst 108,000
>> Texas Republicans changed parties due to Limbaugh?
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 5, 9:00 pm, Christopher Helms <Chrishelms...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> On May 5, 5:39 pm, trippin-2-8-track <rottedHo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> On May 5, 3:01 pm, DeserTBoB <dese...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> Hillary Clinton's in the middle of a major sweep of NC, while
Barack
>>>>>> Obama tries to salvage his loss of polling leads in Indiana today
as
>>>>>> the "last stand" primaries approach within hours. On CNN coverage,
>>>>>> Obama's obviously not comfortable being "wonkish" on policy...take
>>>>>> away his "change/hope/change/hope" gimmick and he's as flat as a
>>>>>> pancake.
>>>>>> Meanwhile, in NC and yesterday in IN, Clinton is finding broad
sup****t
>>>>>> for making the oil companies pay the Federal "gas tax" this summer,
a
>>>>>> concept pooh poohed by Obama, who also voted for Dick Cheney's
skewed
>>>>>> "energy bill" largely seen as a giveaway to Cheney and Bush's oil
>>>>>> buddies in Texas and Saudi Arabia.
>>>>>> Gallup polling now shows Hillary being the one to take on McCain,
with
>>>>>> Obama bouncing around ahead and behind. "Senator Potatohead,"
>>>>>> meanwhile, has been trolling for sorely needed funding with his
droll,
>>>>>> ill-received stump speeches. Notoriously unreliable Rasmussen now
>>>>>> shows Hillary taking Indiana by a convincing margin and winning
with
>>>>>> an 85.1% certitude. Personally, I don't put a lot of stock in
their
>>>>>> predictions, much as I don't in Zogby's, which is a reliable GOP
****ll
>>>>>> operation. However, more credible polling indeed shows Clinton
with
>>>>>> the momentum in both states, and street corner stumping in both
states
>>>>>> has helped her quite a bit, while Obama's "big deal" rallies are
>>>>>> increasingly poorly attended. While Obama's handlers were a month
ago
>>>>>> mocking Clinton for having to bus union members into her rallies,
>>>>>> they're now a "full house," while Obama's staffers are having to
>>>>>> resort to sticking with college campus rallies in smaller venues.
The
>>>>>> "infatuation" stage of his campaign is over, and people are asking,
>>>>>> "Where's the beef?" That's his problem...there isn't any.
>>>>>> On McLaughlin this past week, Pat Buchanan predicted Clinton will
take
>>>>>> Indiana by a wide margin, while all the other pundits on the panel
>>>>>> agreed she'd take it narrowly. Moderator McLaughlin, however,
>>>>>> differs, saying he thinks Obama can still take Indiana by a sliver,
>>>>>> which might mean yet another 50/50 delegate split...worst case
>>>>>> scenario for Clinton. One of the pundits (Monica Crowley?) went so
>>>>>> far as to predict a Hillary upset in NC, but no one else seemed to
be
>>>>>> buying to that. But, if you look at past polling-versus-results
>>>>>> numbers, especially in New Hamp****re, Clinton has a definite
ability
>>>>>> to utilize pre-election momentum, parlaying it into big victories.
NC
>>>>>> is indeed in play, with Obama sunk into single digits, while more
than
>>>>>> half of the credible polls today show Clinton statistically ahead
in
>>>>>> IN. This all goes to show you how unreliable ALL polling has
become
>>>>>> in this primary race; Obama was supposed to take Guam by 20%; he
took
>>>>>> it by only seven votes out of almost 9,000 cast, making Guam a
50/50
>>>>>> split...advantage: Clinton.
>>>>>> It ain't over...not by a long shot.
>>>>>> Buzz in DC: Is Jeremiah Wright really a stealthy Clinton
surrogate,
>>>>>> or just another black racist preacher with a huge mouth?
>>>>>> Observations: Campaign liability Michelle Obama resurfaced Sunday
on
>>>>>> "Meet The Press" and kept her big mouth uncharacteristically shut.
Her
>>>>>> thesis paper has been making the rounds once more...sure poison to
>>>>>> Obama's campaign should the pundits bite on it during the
week...IF.
>>>>>> She's been getting a pass on that issue from the media from Day 1.
>>>>>> MSNBC Obama ****ll Keith Olbermann is becoming increasingly annoying
in
>>>>>> his wacky comments about Clinton. Back to s****ts for you,
Keith...you
>>>>>> can have all the black guys you want over there. Chris Matthews is
>>>>>> now coming around to the conclusion (late) that Obama might lose
this
>>>>>> thing, this after last week saying (correctly) that Obama couldn't
>>>>>> "close the deal" in Pennsylvania. "Senator Potatohead" McCain's
>>>>>> recent TV coverage has been uncomplimentary, showing a very
tuckered
>>>>>> out old man with precious little to say about anything...other than
to
>>>>>> ask for money...please! Clinton campaign honchos have managed
>>>>>> (somehow...thorazine?) to put Bill on ice. He's been noticeably
>>>>>> absent in Indiana, although re****ts have him popping up here and
there
>>>>>> in North Carolina. Maybe Hillary yelled at him? Obama surrogate
and
>>>>>> Richmond, VA mayor/former VA governor L. Douglas Wilder didn't do
>>>>>> Obama any big favors on "Face The Nation" Sunday, while Clinton
>>>>>> booster and Indiana's favorite son, Evan Bayh, come across
>>>>>> convincingly for Clinton, even though he had to use his cell phone
to
>>>>>> replace CBS' failed talk-back circuit.
>>>>>> Predictions: If Clinton ties Obama in NC, it's all over for Obama,
>>>>>> since Clinton will reliably take Kentucky. Once Kentucky is over,
>>>>>> watch for the Florida/Michigan imbroglio to boil over on CNN, Faux
>>>>>> News and in the press...advantage: Clinton...bigtime. MSNBC will
just
>>>>>> continue to whine about how Hillary is mistreating Obama. CNN will
>>>>>> again overtake Faux News in the overall ratings this election
season.
>>>>>> Both CNN and MSNBC have been gaining viewer****p in Neilsen numbers,
>>>>>> CNN by 41% and MSNBC by even more, while Faux has lost 11%. THAT's
>>>>>> why you see Democrats on Faux now...Rupie and his gofer Roger Ailes
>>>>>> realize that sticking with the far-loony right could be fatal to
his
>>>>>> big money tree.
>>>>>> In another challenge to Aussie wacko Rupert Murdoch's throne, Mort
>>>>>> Zuckerman (US News and World Re****t, NY Daily News) will indeed
close
>>>>>> the deal for Newsday, the Long Island-heavy tabloid (the paper
people
>>>>>> read on the LIRR on their way to work), giving Rupie fits. Rupie
>>>>>> can't hope to close that deal, since the FTC will bar the sale to
him
>>>>>> based on his multimedia market saturation in the tri-state area.
>>>>>> Rupie's tabloid New York Post has been skidding in reader****p per
the
>>>>>> ABC, while Newsday and Mort's Daily News have been gaining on both
the
>>>>>> Post and the NY Times. Stay tuned...Rupie will try to do what he
>>>>>> always does (throw more money at Newday to counter Zuckerman) but
will
>>>>>> still lose, which will infuriate him. Murdoch has a history lately
of
>>>>>> making stupid business decisions once he gets riled, the LA Dodgers
>>>>>> screw up being a good case on point. Our long national nightmare
of
>>>>>> having some righttard Aussie control our free media is almost over.
>>>>> one reason: Operation Chaos c/o Rush Limbaugh's dittoheads
>>>>> 108,000 Repubicans voted for Hillay in Texas primary per Rush's
>>>>> orders...
>>>> It's always a fascinating mental exercise to imagine Limbaughs
>>>> reaction if any of the vicious stuff he pukes up every day ever came
>>>> from the mouth of a Democrat. If MoveOn or anyone at Air America
>>>> suggested that Democrats lie, cross over and vote for Huckabee just
to
>>>> disrupt and extend the Republican primaries, much less agitating for
>>>> riots, Limbaugh would be blowing out a ****chlight over Democratic
vote
>>>> fraud.
>>> WHAT'S THIS "IF" **** ? LIMBAUGH IS EXPOSING THE DEMOCRATIC VOTE FOR
>>> WHAT IT IS, DAILY- YOU SHOULD LISTEN TO HIM FOR ONE WEEK BEFORE
>>> POSTING. YOU'LL GET AN EYE OPENER.
>>> He would announce that it was proof positive that liberals
>>>> really are violent fascists.
>>> HE SAYS THAT EVERY DAY RIGHT NOW- WHAT'S THIS "WOULD" **** ?
>>> He would be demanding a federal
>>>> investigation.
>>> LIMBAUGH STAYS AS FAR AWAY FROM THE SO-CALLED "LEGAL" SYSTEM AS
>>> POSSIBLE- TOO MANY LIBERAL LEFT-WING KOOK JUDGES THERE.
>>> He would be on the air every day, literally yelling
>>>> into the microphone that the Democrats were nothing more than lawless
>>>> commie agitators who had to be immediately stopped, for the common
>>>> good.
>>> AGAIN, HE ALREADY DOES THAT, WHAT'S THIS "WOULD" **** ?
>>> Then some good Republican gopher would find the appropriate
>>>> passage of the Patriot Act that allowed the open-ended jailing of
>>>> whoever made the statement, and Chimps DOJ might very well look into
>>>> it.
>>> THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS RUN BY THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE, NOT THE REPUBLICANS
>>>> But since it came from Limbaugh nobody ever says anything about it at
>>>> all.
>>> THAT'S CALLED FREEDOM OF SPEECH- GET USED TO IT
>>> - Hide quoted text -
>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>
>
> the man who organized it called in from Texas live, during the
> Limbaugh show last week
>
> wake up, smell the coffee
>
So someone called Limbaugh and you take that as irrefutable evidence.
Tell us again why,if it worked so well, Hillary's lead was cut in half
in PA between the start of the stunt and the election. Tell us again
why, if Limbaugh has such influence, his party is nominating his least
favorite candidate. Tell us again where you got that number from.
Oh, wait, you never told us those thing the first time unless you
consider "Limbaugh said" and "a caller said" to be proof.
|
