On May 6, 8:31=A0am, George Grapman <sfgeo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> trippin-2-8-track wrote:
>
> =A0 What ever happened to that request to back up your claim thst
108,000
> Texas Republicans changed parties due to Limbaugh?
>
>
>
> > On May 5, 9:00 pm, Christopher Helms <Chrishelms...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On May 5, 5:39 pm, trippin-2-8-track <rottedHo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>> On May 5, 3:01 pm, DeserTBoB <dese...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>> Hillary Clinton's in the middle of a major sweep of NC, while
Barack
> >>>> Obama tries to salvage his loss of polling leads in Indiana today
as
> >>>> the "last stand" primaries approach within hours. =A0On CNN
coverage,=
> >>>> Obama's obviously not comfortable being "wonkish" on policy...take
> >>>> away his "change/hope/change/hope" gimmick and he's as flat as a
> >>>> pancake. =A0
> >>>> Meanwhile, in NC and yesterday in IN, Clinton is finding broad
sup****=
t
> >>>> for making the oil companies pay the Federal "gas tax" this summer,
a=
> >>>> concept pooh poohed by Obama, who also voted for Dick Cheney's
skewed=
> >>>> "energy bill" largely seen as a giveaway to Cheney and Bush's oil
> >>>> buddies in Texas and Saudi Arabia.
> >>>> Gallup polling now shows Hillary being the one to take on McCain,
wit=
h
> >>>> Obama bouncing around ahead and behind. =A0"Senator Potatohead,"
> >>>> meanwhile, has been trolling for sorely needed funding with his
droll=
,
> >>>> ill-received stump speeches. =A0Notoriously unreliable Rasmussen
now
> >>>> shows Hillary taking Indiana by a convincing margin and winning
with
> >>>> an 85.1% certitude. =A0Personally, I don't put a lot of stock in
thei=
r
> >>>> predictions, much as I don't in Zogby's, which is a reliable GOP
****l=
l
> >>>> operation. =A0However, more credible polling indeed shows Clinton
wit=
h
> >>>> the momentum in both states, and street corner stumping in both
state=
s
> >>>> has helped her quite a bit, while Obama's "big deal" rallies are
> >>>> increasingly poorly attended. =A0While Obama's handlers were a
month =
ago
> >>>> mocking Clinton for having to bus union members into her rallies,
> >>>> they're now a "full house," while Obama's staffers are having to
> >>>> resort to sticking with college campus rallies in smaller venues.
=A0=
The
> >>>> "infatuation" stage of his campaign is over, and people are asking,
> >>>> "Where's the beef?" =A0That's his problem...there isn't any.
> >>>> On McLaughlin this past week, Pat Buchanan predicted Clinton will
tak=
e
> >>>> Indiana by a wide margin, while all the other pundits on the panel
> >>>> agreed she'd take it narrowly. =A0Moderator McLaughlin, however,
> >>>> differs, saying he thinks Obama can still take Indiana by a sliver,
> >>>> which might mean yet another 50/50 delegate split...worst case
> >>>> scenario for Clinton. =A0One of the pundits (Monica Crowley?) went
so=
> >>>> far as to predict a Hillary upset in NC, but no one else seemed to
be=
> >>>> buying to that. =A0But, if you look at past polling-versus-results
> >>>> numbers, especially in New Hamp****re, Clinton has a definite
ability
> >>>> to utilize pre-election momentum, parlaying it into big victories.
=
=A0NC
> >>>> is indeed in play, with Obama sunk into single digits, while more
tha=
n
> >>>> half of the credible polls today show Clinton statistically ahead
in
> >>>> IN. =A0This all goes to show you how unreliable ALL polling has
becom=
e
> >>>> in this primary race; Obama was supposed to take Guam by 20%; he
took=
> >>>> it by only seven votes out of almost 9,000 cast, making Guam a
50/50
> >>>> split...advantage: Clinton.
> >>>> It ain't over...not by a long shot.
> >>>> Buzz in DC: =A0Is Jeremiah Wright really a stealthy Clinton
surrogate=
,
> >>>> or just another black racist preacher with a huge mouth?
> >>>> Observations: =A0Campaign liability Michelle Obama resurfaced
Sunday =
on
> >>>> "Meet The Press" and kept her big mouth uncharacteristically shut.
He=
r
> >>>> thesis paper has been making the rounds once more...sure poison to
> >>>> Obama's campaign should the pundits bite on it during the
week...IF.
> >>>> She's been getting a pass on that issue from the media from Day 1.
> >>>> MSNBC Obama ****ll Keith Olbermann is becoming increasingly annoying
i=
n
> >>>> his wacky comments about Clinton. =A0Back to s****ts for you,
Keith...=
you
> >>>> can have all the black guys you want over there. =A0Chris Matthews
is=
> >>>> now coming around to the conclusion (late) that Obama might lose
this=
> >>>> thing, this after last week saying (correctly) that Obama couldn't
> >>>> "close the deal" in Pennsylvania. =A0"Senator Potatohead" McCain's
> >>>> recent TV coverage has been uncomplimentary, showing a very
tuckered
> >>>> out old man with precious little to say about anything...other than
t=
o
> >>>> ask for money...please! =A0Clinton campaign honchos have managed
> >>>> (somehow...thorazine?) to put Bill on ice. =A0He's been noticeably
> >>>> absent in Indiana, although re****ts have him popping up here and
ther=
e
> >>>> in North Carolina. =A0Maybe Hillary yelled at him? =A0Obama
surrogate=
and
> >>>> Richmond, VA mayor/former VA governor =A0L. Douglas Wilder didn't
do
> >>>> Obama any big favors on "Face The Nation" Sunday, while Clinton
> >>>> booster and Indiana's favorite son, Evan Bayh, come across
> >>>> convincingly for Clinton, even though he had to use his cell phone
to=
> >>>> replace CBS' failed talk-back circuit.
> >>>> Predictions: =A0If Clinton ties Obama in NC, it's all over for
Obama,=
> >>>> since Clinton will reliably take Kentucky. =A0Once Kentucky is
over,
> >>>> watch for the Florida/Michigan imbroglio to boil over on CNN, Faux
> >>>> News and in the press...advantage: Clinton...bigtime. =A0MSNBC will
j=
ust
> >>>> continue to whine about how Hillary is mistreating Obama. =A0CNN
will=
> >>>> again overtake Faux News in the overall ratings this election
season.=
> >>>> Both CNN and MSNBC have been gaining viewer****p in Neilsen numbers,
> >>>> CNN by 41% and MSNBC by even more, while Faux has lost 11%.
=A0THAT's=
> >>>> why you see Democrats on Faux now...Rupie and his gofer Roger Ailes
> >>>> realize that sticking with the far-loony right could be fatal to
his
> >>>> big money tree.
> >>>> In another challenge to Aussie wacko Rupert Murdoch's throne, Mort
> >>>> Zuckerman (US News and World Re****t, NY Daily News) will indeed
close=
> >>>> the deal for Newsday, the Long Island-heavy tabloid (the paper
people=
> >>>> read on the LIRR on their way to work), giving Rupie fits. =A0Rupie
> >>>> can't hope to close that deal, since the FTC will bar the sale to
him=
> >>>> based on his multimedia market saturation in the tri-state area.
> >>>> Rupie's tabloid New York Post has been skidding in reader****p per
the=
> >>>> ABC, while Newsday and Mort's Daily News have been gaining on both
th=
e
> >>>> Post and the NY Times. =A0Stay tuned...Rupie will try to do what he
> >>>> always does (throw more money at Newday to counter Zuckerman) but
wil=
l
> >>>> still lose, which will infuriate him. =A0Murdoch has a history
lately=
of
> >>>> making stupid business decisions once he gets riled, the LA Dodgers
> >>>> screw up being a good case on point. =A0Our long national nightmare
o=
f
> >>>> having some righttard Aussie control our free media is almost over.
> >>> one reason: =A0 Operation Chaos c/o Rush Limbaugh's dittoheads
> >>> 108,000 Repubicans voted for Hillay in Texas primary per Rush's
> >>> orders...
> >> It's always a fascinating mental exercise to imagine Limbaughs
> >> reaction if any of the vicious stuff he pukes up every day ever came
> >> from the mouth of a Democrat. If MoveOn or anyone at Air America
> >> suggested that Democrats lie, cross over and vote for Huckabee just
to
> >> disrupt and extend the Republican primaries, much less agitating for
> >> riots, Limbaugh would be blowing out a ****chlight over Democratic
vote
> >> fraud.
>
> > WHAT'S THIS "IF" **** ? =A0LIMBAUGH IS EXPOSING THE DEMOCRATIC VOTE
FOR
> > WHAT IT IS, DAILY- YOU SHOULD LISTEN TO HIM FOR ONE WEEK BEFORE
> > POSTING. =A0YOU'LL GET AN EYE OPENER.
>
> > =A0He would announce that it was proof positive that liberals
> >> really are violent fascists.
>
> > HE SAYS THAT EVERY DAY RIGHT NOW- WHAT'S THIS "WOULD" **** ?
>
> > =A0He would be demanding a federal
> >> investigation.
>
> > LIMBAUGH STAYS AS FAR AWAY FROM THE SO-CALLED "LEGAL" SYSTEM AS
> > POSSIBLE- TOO MANY LIBERAL LEFT-WING KOOK JUDGES THERE.
>
> > He would be on the air every day, literally yelling
> >> into the microphone that the Democrats were nothing more than lawless
> >> commie agitators who had to be immediately stopped, for the common
> >> good.
>
> > AGAIN, HE ALREADY DOES THAT, WHAT'S THIS "WOULD" **** ?
>
> > =A0Then some good Republican gopher would find the appropriate
> >> passage of the Patriot Act that allowed the open-ended jailing of
> >> whoever made the statement, and Chimps DOJ might very well look into
> >> it.
>
> > THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS RUN BY THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE, NOT THE REPUBLICANS
>
> >> But since it came from Limbaugh nobody ever says anything about it at
> >> all.
>
> > THAT'S CALLED FREEDOM OF SPEECH- GET USED TO IT
>
> > - Hide quoted text -
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
the man who organized it called in from Texas live, during the
Limbaugh show last week
wake up, smell the coffee
|
