trippin-2-8-track wrote:
What ever happened to that request to back up your claim thst 108,000
Texas Republicans changed parties due to Limbaugh?
> On May 5, 9:00 pm, Christopher Helms <Chrishelms...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On May 5, 5:39 pm, trippin-2-8-track <rottedHo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 5, 3:01 pm, DeserTBoB <dese...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> Hillary Clinton's in the middle of a major sweep of NC, while Barack
>>>> Obama tries to salvage his loss of polling leads in Indiana today as
>>>> the "last stand" primaries approach within hours. On CNN coverage,
>>>> Obama's obviously not comfortable being "wonkish" on policy...take
>>>> away his "change/hope/change/hope" gimmick and he's as flat as a
>>>> pancake.
>>>> Meanwhile, in NC and yesterday in IN, Clinton is finding broad
sup****t
>>>> for making the oil companies pay the Federal "gas tax" this summer, a
>>>> concept pooh poohed by Obama, who also voted for Dick Cheney's skewed
>>>> "energy bill" largely seen as a giveaway to Cheney and Bush's oil
>>>> buddies in Texas and Saudi Arabia.
>>>> Gallup polling now shows Hillary being the one to take on McCain,
with
>>>> Obama bouncing around ahead and behind. "Senator Potatohead,"
>>>> meanwhile, has been trolling for sorely needed funding with his
droll,
>>>> ill-received stump speeches. Notoriously unreliable Rasmussen now
>>>> shows Hillary taking Indiana by a convincing margin and winning with
>>>> an 85.1% certitude. Personally, I don't put a lot of stock in their
>>>> predictions, much as I don't in Zogby's, which is a reliable GOP
****ll
>>>> operation. However, more credible polling indeed shows Clinton with
>>>> the momentum in both states, and street corner stumping in both
states
>>>> has helped her quite a bit, while Obama's "big deal" rallies are
>>>> increasingly poorly attended. While Obama's handlers were a month
ago
>>>> mocking Clinton for having to bus union members into her rallies,
>>>> they're now a "full house," while Obama's staffers are having to
>>>> resort to sticking with college campus rallies in smaller venues.
The
>>>> "infatuation" stage of his campaign is over, and people are asking,
>>>> "Where's the beef?" That's his problem...there isn't any.
>>>> On McLaughlin this past week, Pat Buchanan predicted Clinton will
take
>>>> Indiana by a wide margin, while all the other pundits on the panel
>>>> agreed she'd take it narrowly. Moderator McLaughlin, however,
>>>> differs, saying he thinks Obama can still take Indiana by a sliver,
>>>> which might mean yet another 50/50 delegate split...worst case
>>>> scenario for Clinton. One of the pundits (Monica Crowley?) went so
>>>> far as to predict a Hillary upset in NC, but no one else seemed to be
>>>> buying to that. But, if you look at past polling-versus-results
>>>> numbers, especially in New Hamp****re, Clinton has a definite ability
>>>> to utilize pre-election momentum, parlaying it into big victories.
NC
>>>> is indeed in play, with Obama sunk into single digits, while more
than
>>>> half of the credible polls today show Clinton statistically ahead in
>>>> IN. This all goes to show you how unreliable ALL polling has become
>>>> in this primary race; Obama was supposed to take Guam by 20%; he took
>>>> it by only seven votes out of almost 9,000 cast, making Guam a 50/50
>>>> split...advantage: Clinton.
>>>> It ain't over...not by a long shot.
>>>> Buzz in DC: Is Jeremiah Wright really a stealthy Clinton surrogate,
>>>> or just another black racist preacher with a huge mouth?
>>>> Observations: Campaign liability Michelle Obama resurfaced Sunday on
>>>> "Meet The Press" and kept her big mouth uncharacteristically shut.
Her
>>>> thesis paper has been making the rounds once more...sure poison to
>>>> Obama's campaign should the pundits bite on it during the week...IF.
>>>> She's been getting a pass on that issue from the media from Day 1.
>>>> MSNBC Obama ****ll Keith Olbermann is becoming increasingly annoying
in
>>>> his wacky comments about Clinton. Back to s****ts for you,
Keith...you
>>>> can have all the black guys you want over there. Chris Matthews is
>>>> now coming around to the conclusion (late) that Obama might lose this
>>>> thing, this after last week saying (correctly) that Obama couldn't
>>>> "close the deal" in Pennsylvania. "Senator Potatohead" McCain's
>>>> recent TV coverage has been uncomplimentary, showing a very tuckered
>>>> out old man with precious little to say about anything...other than
to
>>>> ask for money...please! Clinton campaign honchos have managed
>>>> (somehow...thorazine?) to put Bill on ice. He's been noticeably
>>>> absent in Indiana, although re****ts have him popping up here and
there
>>>> in North Carolina. Maybe Hillary yelled at him? Obama surrogate and
>>>> Richmond, VA mayor/former VA governor L. Douglas Wilder didn't do
>>>> Obama any big favors on "Face The Nation" Sunday, while Clinton
>>>> booster and Indiana's favorite son, Evan Bayh, come across
>>>> convincingly for Clinton, even though he had to use his cell phone to
>>>> replace CBS' failed talk-back circuit.
>>>> Predictions: If Clinton ties Obama in NC, it's all over for Obama,
>>>> since Clinton will reliably take Kentucky. Once Kentucky is over,
>>>> watch for the Florida/Michigan imbroglio to boil over on CNN, Faux
>>>> News and in the press...advantage: Clinton...bigtime. MSNBC will
just
>>>> continue to whine about how Hillary is mistreating Obama. CNN will
>>>> again overtake Faux News in the overall ratings this election season.
>>>> Both CNN and MSNBC have been gaining viewer****p in Neilsen numbers,
>>>> CNN by 41% and MSNBC by even more, while Faux has lost 11%. THAT's
>>>> why you see Democrats on Faux now...Rupie and his gofer Roger Ailes
>>>> realize that sticking with the far-loony right could be fatal to his
>>>> big money tree.
>>>> In another challenge to Aussie wacko Rupert Murdoch's throne, Mort
>>>> Zuckerman (US News and World Re****t, NY Daily News) will indeed close
>>>> the deal for Newsday, the Long Island-heavy tabloid (the paper people
>>>> read on the LIRR on their way to work), giving Rupie fits. Rupie
>>>> can't hope to close that deal, since the FTC will bar the sale to him
>>>> based on his multimedia market saturation in the tri-state area.
>>>> Rupie's tabloid New York Post has been skidding in reader****p per the
>>>> ABC, while Newsday and Mort's Daily News have been gaining on both
the
>>>> Post and the NY Times. Stay tuned...Rupie will try to do what he
>>>> always does (throw more money at Newday to counter Zuckerman) but
will
>>>> still lose, which will infuriate him. Murdoch has a history lately
of
>>>> making stupid business decisions once he gets riled, the LA Dodgers
>>>> screw up being a good case on point. Our long national nightmare of
>>>> having some righttard Aussie control our free media is almost over.
>>> one reason: Operation Chaos c/o Rush Limbaugh's dittoheads
>>> 108,000 Repubicans voted for Hillay in Texas primary per Rush's
>>> orders...
>> It's always a fascinating mental exercise to imagine Limbaughs
>> reaction if any of the vicious stuff he pukes up every day ever came
>> from the mouth of a Democrat. If MoveOn or anyone at Air America
>> suggested that Democrats lie, cross over and vote for Huckabee just to
>> disrupt and extend the Republican primaries, much less agitating for
>> riots, Limbaugh would be blowing out a ****chlight over Democratic vote
>> fraud.
>
> WHAT'S THIS "IF" **** ? LIMBAUGH IS EXPOSING THE DEMOCRATIC VOTE FOR
> WHAT IT IS, DAILY- YOU SHOULD LISTEN TO HIM FOR ONE WEEK BEFORE
> POSTING. YOU'LL GET AN EYE OPENER.
>
>
> He would announce that it was proof positive that liberals
>> really are violent fascists.
>
> HE SAYS THAT EVERY DAY RIGHT NOW- WHAT'S THIS "WOULD" **** ?
>
> He would be demanding a federal
>> investigation.
>
> LIMBAUGH STAYS AS FAR AWAY FROM THE SO-CALLED "LEGAL" SYSTEM AS
> POSSIBLE- TOO MANY LIBERAL LEFT-WING KOOK JUDGES THERE.
>
>
> He would be on the air every day, literally yelling
>> into the microphone that the Democrats were nothing more than lawless
>> commie agitators who had to be immediately stopped, for the common
>> good.
>
> AGAIN, HE ALREADY DOES THAT, WHAT'S THIS "WOULD" **** ?
>
>
> Then some good Republican gopher would find the appropriate
>> passage of the Patriot Act that allowed the open-ended jailing of
>> whoever made the statement, and Chimps DOJ might very well look into
>> it.
>
> THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS RUN BY THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE, NOT THE REPUBLICANS
>
>> But since it came from Limbaugh nobody ever says anything about it at
>> all.
>
> THAT'S CALLED FREEDOM OF SPEECH- GET USED TO IT
>
> - Hide quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -
>
|
