On May 5, 9:00=A0pm, Christopher Helms <Chrishelms...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 5, 5:39=A0pm, trippin-2-8-track <rottedHo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 5, 3:01=A0pm, DeserTBoB <dese...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > Hillary Clinton's in the middle of a major sweep of NC, while Barack
> > > Obama tries to salvage his loss of polling leads in Indiana today as
> > > the "last stand" primaries approach within hours. =A0On CNN
coverage,
> > > Obama's obviously not comfortable being "wonkish" on policy...take
> > > away his "change/hope/change/hope" gimmick and he's as flat as a
> > > pancake. =A0
>
> > > Meanwhile, in NC and yesterday in IN, Clinton is finding broad
sup****t=
> > > for making the oil companies pay the Federal "gas tax" this summer,
a
> > > concept pooh poohed by Obama, who also voted for Dick Cheney's
skewed
> > > "energy bill" largely seen as a giveaway to Cheney and Bush's oil
> > > buddies in Texas and Saudi Arabia.
>
> > > Gallup polling now shows Hillary being the one to take on McCain,
with=
> > > Obama bouncing around ahead and behind. =A0"Senator Potatohead,"
> > > meanwhile, has been trolling for sorely needed funding with his
droll,=
> > > ill-received stump speeches. =A0Notoriously unreliable Rasmussen now
> > > shows Hillary taking Indiana by a convincing margin and winning with
> > > an 85.1% certitude. =A0Personally, I don't put a lot of stock in
their=
> > > predictions, much as I don't in Zogby's, which is a reliable GOP
****ll=
> > > operation. =A0However, more credible polling indeed shows Clinton
with=
> > > the momentum in both states, and street corner stumping in both
states=
> > > has helped her quite a bit, while Obama's "big deal" rallies are
> > > increasingly poorly attended. =A0While Obama's handlers were a month
a=
go
> > > mocking Clinton for having to bus union members into her rallies,
> > > they're now a "full house," while Obama's staffers are having to
> > > resort to sticking with college campus rallies in smaller venues.
=A0T=
he
> > > "infatuation" stage of his campaign is over, and people are asking,
> > > "Where's the beef?" =A0That's his problem...there isn't any.
>
> > > On McLaughlin this past week, Pat Buchanan predicted Clinton will
take=
> > > Indiana by a wide margin, while all the other pundits on the panel
> > > agreed she'd take it narrowly. =A0Moderator McLaughlin, however,
> > > differs, saying he thinks Obama can still take Indiana by a sliver,
> > > which might mean yet another 50/50 delegate split...worst case
> > > scenario for Clinton. =A0One of the pundits (Monica Crowley?) went
so
> > > far as to predict a Hillary upset in NC, but no one else seemed to
be
> > > buying to that. =A0But, if you look at past polling-versus-results
> > > numbers, especially in New Hamp****re, Clinton has a definite ability
> > > to utilize pre-election momentum, parlaying it into big victories.
=A0=
NC
> > > is indeed in play, with Obama sunk into single digits, while more
than=
> > > half of the credible polls today show Clinton statistically ahead in
> > > IN. =A0This all goes to show you how unreliable ALL polling has
become=
> > > in this primary race; Obama was supposed to take Guam by 20%; he
took
> > > it by only seven votes out of almost 9,000 cast, making Guam a 50/50
> > > split...advantage: Clinton.
>
> > > It ain't over...not by a long shot.
>
> > > Buzz in DC: =A0Is Jeremiah Wright really a stealthy Clinton
surrogate,=
> > > or just another black racist preacher with a huge mouth?
>
> > > Observations: =A0Campaign liability Michelle Obama resurfaced Sunday
o=
n
> > > "Meet The Press" and kept her big mouth uncharacteristically shut.
Her=
> > > thesis paper has been making the rounds once more...sure poison to
> > > Obama's campaign should the pundits bite on it during the week...IF.
> > > She's been getting a pass on that issue from the media from Day 1.
> > > MSNBC Obama ****ll Keith Olbermann is becoming increasingly annoying
in=
> > > his wacky comments about Clinton. =A0Back to s****ts for you,
Keith...y=
ou
> > > can have all the black guys you want over there. =A0Chris Matthews
is
> > > now coming around to the conclusion (late) that Obama might lose
this
> > > thing, this after last week saying (correctly) that Obama couldn't
> > > "close the deal" in Pennsylvania. =A0"Senator Potatohead" McCain's
> > > recent TV coverage has been uncomplimentary, showing a very tuckered
> > > out old man with precious little to say about anything...other than
to=
> > > ask for money...please! =A0Clinton campaign honchos have managed
> > > (somehow...thorazine?) to put Bill on ice. =A0He's been noticeably
> > > absent in Indiana, although re****ts have him popping up here and
there=
> > > in North Carolina. =A0Maybe Hillary yelled at him? =A0Obama
surrogate =
and
> > > Richmond, VA mayor/former VA governor =A0L. Douglas Wilder didn't do
> > > Obama any big favors on "Face The Nation" Sunday, while Clinton
> > > booster and Indiana's favorite son, Evan Bayh, come across
> > > convincingly for Clinton, even though he had to use his cell phone
to
> > > replace CBS' failed talk-back circuit.
>
> > > Predictions: =A0If Clinton ties Obama in NC, it's all over for
Obama,
> > > since Clinton will reliably take Kentucky. =A0Once Kentucky is over,
> > > watch for the Florida/Michigan imbroglio to boil over on CNN, Faux
> > > News and in the press...advantage: Clinton...bigtime. =A0MSNBC will
ju=
st
> > > continue to whine about how Hillary is mistreating Obama. =A0CNN
will
> > > again overtake Faux News in the overall ratings this election
season.
> > > Both CNN and MSNBC have been gaining viewer****p in Neilsen numbers,
> > > CNN by 41% and MSNBC by even more, while Faux has lost 11%.
=A0THAT's
> > > why you see Democrats on Faux now...Rupie and his gofer Roger Ailes
> > > realize that sticking with the far-loony right could be fatal to his
> > > big money tree.
>
> > > In another challenge to Aussie wacko Rupert Murdoch's throne, Mort
> > > Zuckerman (US News and World Re****t, NY Daily News) will indeed
close
> > > the deal for Newsday, the Long Island-heavy tabloid (the paper
people
> > > read on the LIRR on their way to work), giving Rupie fits. =A0Rupie
> > > can't hope to close that deal, since the FTC will bar the sale to
him
> > > based on his multimedia market saturation in the tri-state area.
> > > Rupie's tabloid New York Post has been skidding in reader****p per
the
> > > ABC, while Newsday and Mort's Daily News have been gaining on both
the=
> > > Post and the NY Times. =A0Stay tuned...Rupie will try to do what he
> > > always does (throw more money at Newday to counter Zuckerman) but
will=
> > > still lose, which will infuriate him. =A0Murdoch has a history
lately =
of
> > > making stupid business decisions once he gets riled, the LA Dodgers
> > > screw up being a good case on point. =A0Our long national nightmare
of=
> > > having some righttard Aussie control our free media is almost over.
>
> > one reason: =A0 Operation Chaos c/o Rush Limbaugh's dittoheads
>
> > 108,000 Repubicans voted for Hillay in Texas primary per Rush's
> > orders...
>
> It's always a fascinating mental exercise to imagine Limbaughs
> reaction if any of the vicious stuff he pukes up every day ever came
> from the mouth of a Democrat. If MoveOn or anyone at Air America
> suggested that Democrats lie, cross over and vote for Huckabee just to
> disrupt and extend the Republican primaries, much less agitating for
> riots, Limbaugh would be blowing out a ****chlight over Democratic vote
> fraud.
WHAT'S THIS "IF" **** ? LIMBAUGH IS EXPOSING THE DEMOCRATIC VOTE FOR
WHAT IT IS, DAILY- YOU SHOULD LISTEN TO HIM FOR ONE WEEK BEFORE
POSTING. YOU'LL GET AN EYE OPENER.
He would announce that it was proof positive that liberals
> really are violent fascists.
HE SAYS THAT EVERY DAY RIGHT NOW- WHAT'S THIS "WOULD" **** ?
He would be demanding a federal
> investigation.
LIMBAUGH STAYS AS FAR AWAY FROM THE SO-CALLED "LEGAL" SYSTEM AS
POSSIBLE- TOO MANY LIBERAL LEFT-WING KOOK JUDGES THERE.
He would be on the air every day, literally yelling
> into the microphone that the Democrats were nothing more than lawless
> commie agitators who had to be immediately stopped, for the common
> good.
AGAIN, HE ALREADY DOES THAT, WHAT'S THIS "WOULD" **** ?
Then some good Republican gopher would find the appropriate
> passage of the Patriot Act that allowed the open-ended jailing of
> whoever made the statement, and Chimps DOJ might very well look into
> it.
THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS RUN BY THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE, NOT THE REPUBLICANS
>
> But since it came from Limbaugh nobody ever says anything about it at
> all.
THAT'S CALLED FREEDOM OF SPEECH- GET USED TO IT
- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
